Let us take it this way, We will create their needs. So we will get why they are needed.
Try to guess, which functions will be executed in the following program:
public class MyClass {
public static void main(String args[]) {
MyClass obj = new MyClass();
obj.fun1(10);
}
void fun1(byte val){
System.out.println(val);
}
void fun1(int val){
System.out.println(val);
}
void fun1(float val){
System.out.println(val);
}
void fun1(long val){
System.out.println(val);
}
}
It seems like every method is capable to run this program because 10 is still literal because It has no data type. Before Java, In previous technologies, this scenario gave an ambiguity error. But Java solves this problem by removing the concepts of literals. It means Java provide a data type immediately when these born. So here 10 is no more literal. Java provides Integer data type for it. So now it is of Integer type that's why the second method will be called.
By this way, default data types assigned to particular literals are as follow:
Try to guess, which functions will be executed in the following program:
public class MyClass {
public static void main(String args[]) {
MyClass obj = new MyClass();
obj.fun1(10);
}
void fun1(byte val){
System.out.println(val);
}
void fun1(int val){
System.out.println(val);
}
void fun1(float val){
System.out.println(val);
}
void fun1(long val){
System.out.println(val);
}
}
It seems like every method is capable to run this program because 10 is still literal because It has no data type. Before Java, In previous technologies, this scenario gave an ambiguity error. But Java solves this problem by removing the concepts of literals. It means Java provide a data type immediately when these born. So here 10 is no more literal. Java provides Integer data type for it. So now it is of Integer type that's why the second method will be called.
By this way, default data types assigned to particular literals are as follow:
Integral Number(10) => Integer
Floating Number(10.0) => Double
Characters('a') => Character
Boolean(true) => Boolean
So If we write,
long var = 9223372036854775807;
java will give an error
/MyClass.java:5: error: integer number too large: 9223372036854775807
long lv = 9223372036854775807;
^
1 error
When we write 9223372036854775807, Java tries to make it Integer but it is going out of range of Integer. Because Java is a strictly typed language. I will through error.
Java solves this problem but suffix 'L' with the number, now Java will convert it into Long instead of Integer. and It will run fine,
long var = 9223372036854775807L;
Same as for double, because by default floating number is double so to convert these into the float, Java provides 'F'
Suffix 'L' and 'F' both are Not Case-Sensitive.
Now discuss one problem on the basis of this scenario, as Interviewer asks usually.
public class MyClass {
public static void main(String args[]) {
byte a = 10;
byte b = 20;
byte c = a + b;
}
}
What will be Output of this? We can predict 30. But unfortunately, it will give an error.
^
1 error
Because Result of any operations is always literal, So 30 becomes Integer before assigning into c.
public static void main(String args[]) {
byte a = 10;
byte b = 20;
byte c = a + b;
}
}
What will be Output of this? We can predict 30. But unfortunately, it will give an error.
/MyClass.java:5: error: incompatible types: possible lossy conversion from int
byte c = a + b;
to byte
^
1 error
Because Result of any operations is always literal, So 30 becomes Integer before assigning into c.
Thank you.
ReplyDeleteActually i had come across this question in one interview. I have given the answer on logical way but with above theory behind it,now able to understand the real concept behind it.
Thank you, Devendra. Your feedback and suggetions are important to us.
DeleteHey Buddy please upload more topics. In java ocean lots of topic we have.
DeleteSure Devendra, I am working on them.
DeleteThere is one FYI for you, Your email subscription has not been confirmed yet. Can you please subscribe JavaVines again and confirm from your inbox? Does it make sense?
A very usuful information,thanks for sharing
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThank you very much for your precious feedback.
Delete